• CT Law Tribune 'State Has Been Shortsighted'
    Advocate says more programs needed to help at-risk youth
    February 18, 2008

  • CCA & Hospital of Central Connecticut Receive Grant to Expand MLPP

  • New Attorney Joins CCA: Bonnie Roswig joins MLPP

  • Changing the Judiciary's Relaltionship with a Community, One Child at a Time
    ABA Judges' Journal
    Summer 2007

  • OCR Complaint (PDF)
    Complaint filed on behalf of limited-English proficient ("LEP") students enrolled in the Hartford Public School District ("the District") in Hartford, CT and their parents. The LEP students and their parents that this complaint refers to are Somali-Bantu, Liberian, and Spanish-speaking.

  • Foster Care Population: Minority Kids In Majority
    Hartford Courant
    August 13, 2007

  • Raising the Age for Juvenile Court Jurisdiction
    (Budget implementer: Public Act No. 07-4)

    Beginning January 1, 2010, 16 and 17 year olds may have their charged offenses adjudicated in juvenile court. Juvenile cases involving serious felonies will still be automatically transferred to adult criminal court and prosecutors may still ask the juvenile court judge to transfer other cases to adult court.

    The “raise the age” initiative will eliminate the “Youth In Crisis” program for 16 and 17 years olds charged with status offenses. Instead, these youth will be eligible for the Families With Service Needs program.

    EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 2010

  • Complaint: Immigrants Ill-Served In City Schools
    Hartford Courant
    May 31, 2007

  • Justice for Troubled Teens
    Hartford Courant
    May 31, 2007

  • Paralegal with Medical-Legal Partnership Project

  • A Teenage Girl Waits In A Shelter
    Hartford Courant
    May 29, 2007

  • The Truancy Epidemic: Officials In City Struggle To Curb Chronic Absenteeism
    Hartford Courant
    May 14, 2007

  • Turning 18, And Needing Our Help
    Hartford Courant
    May 5, 2007

  • Part-Time Attorney Position, Teen Legal Advocacy Clinic

  • New Option For Troubled Kids
    Hartford Courant
    March 5, 2007

  • US Census Report
    Released Jan 2007
    A Child's Day

  • With Every Passing Day
    Hartford Courant
    December 10, 2006


    Children who learn in classrooms with white, black, brown and yellow faces are best prepared for the real world where, with luck, they will encounter diversity in the workplace. It is common sense that children who interact with peers from different backgrounds will grow up with fewer prejudices and be more likely to get along in a multicultural society.

  • Crime, Violence, Discipline and Safety in U.S. Public Schools (PDF)
    Findings from the School Survey on Crime and Safety, 2003-2004
    Released December 2006

  • Standards of Practice for Child Protection Attorneys Practicing in Juvenile Matters
    Pursuant to C.G.S 46b-123c(3) the Commission on Child Protection issued Standards of Practice to be used by attorneys as a guide to providing competent and zealous advocacy for their clients.

  • Panel: Despite Sheff v. O’Neill, school segregation has not eased
    by Richard Veilleux - November 28, 2006

    Ellen Ash Peters, the retired chief justice of the Connecticut Supreme Court and author of the 1996 Sheff v. O'Neill ruling that racial isolation in Hartford's schools was unconstitutional, let more than 100 people attending a symposium on the ruling in on a little secret: The court purposely left it up to the state legislature to implement change.

  • November 2, 2006 Memo from the Hartford School System's Assistant Superintendent for Special Education Services indicating that asking a parent to pick up a child at school because of a behavioral incident is to be considered a school suspension.

  • "Bureau Blogs" Produced by the CT State Dept. of Education's Bureau of Special Education, the blog consolidates, in a monthly format, the information and requests that schools receive from the Bureau of Special Education. To access the blogs, view PDF's below or go the Bureau's website.

  • SES Tutoring Request Form (PDF)
    The Supplemental Educational Services (SES) program is part of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001. Through the SES program, parents can get free tutoring services for their children. These services provide extra help in academic subjects, such as reading, language arts, and mathematics, to students who may be struggling in school. These services are typically delivered outside the regular school day-before or after school on weekends or during the summer months. This tutoring must be in line with state academic standards and connected to the school district's instructional program. Eligible families choose an SES provider from a list developed by their state. School districts pay providers directly for services. The SES program encourages states to approve a variety of organizations as SES providers, thus giving students and families the largest possible range of quality options.

  • For Local Heroes, A Day To Take A Bow
    November 10 2006
    Martha Stone wins Local Heroes Award

  • Impact of Foster Care Placement on Child Development (PDF)
    An important recent study conducted by researchers at the University of Minnesota, and published in the journal Development and Psychopathology, demonstrates the harmful impact of foster-care placement on child development.

  • The Superior Court for Juvenile Matters has Posted a Standing Order
    The Superior Court for Juvenile Matters has post a standing order concerning notification "of all court proceedings concerning any child in foster care to foster parents, relative caregivers and pre-adoptive parents of such children". For more information you may go to http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/super/Standorders/Juvenile/fostercare.htm.

  • CCA Seminar
    The Center for Children's Advocacy will offer a seminar in Bridgeport on Thursday, November 30, from 1:30 - 3:15 pm at the Child Guidance Center of Greater Bridgeport.

    Entitled, "What's New? What's in the Pipeline?" this seminar will repeat recent presentations held in Hartford. Speakers will be:

    Darlene Dunbar, Commissioner, Department of Children and Families

    Bill Carbone, Executive Director, Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division

    Carolyn Signorelli, Chief Child Protection Attorney, Child Protection Commission

    Honorable Barbara Quinn, Chief Administrative Judge, Superior Court for Juvenile Matters

    If you would like to attend this seminar, please reserve a space by emailing: atremont@kidscounsel.org

  • DCF Adolescent Policy Changes and Additions (Word Document)

  • In re Davonta V. (October 10, 2006)
    Connecticut Appellate Court
    Abuse and Neglect: ...the Appellate Court affirmed the trial court's decision to terminate a mother's parental rights on the grounds that the mother failed to achieve a reasonable degree of rehabilitation and termination of parental rights was in the child's best interest.

  • CC v. Granby Bd. Of Educ. (September 30, 2006)
    U.S. District Court
    Civil Rights, Education: In an interesting federal special education decision, the United States District Court, District of Connecticut, awarded plaintiff over $93,000 in attorney's fees for a successful administrative hearing decision garnered through a Due Process procedure.

  • Conn. Office of Prot. and Advocacy for Persons with Disabilities v. Hartford Bd. Of Educ.
    (September 15, 2006)

    The Second Circuit Court of Appeals
    Education: The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's judgment which entered a permanent injunction against the Hartford Board of Education in the case of Protection & Advocacy v. Hartford Bd. of Educ. This is the case where the state office of Protection and Advocacy for Persons with Disabilities (P&A) brought suit against the Hartford Board of Educ. ("HBOE") requesting access to the HBOE's controversial Hartford Transitional Learning Academy ("HTLA") to (1) observe programs and speak with students and (2) give P&A a directory of HTLA students and contact information for their parents/guardians to investigate allegations of abuse and neglect at the school.

  • October 2006
    KidsCounsel Newsletter Abobe PDF
    Sheff: Ten Year Anniversary; CCA Welcomes Nina Aasen, Director, TeamChild Project; Two New Task Forces Work to Resolve Issue of Open Courts...

  • Joint Juvenile Justice Strategic Plan
  • Medical Insurance Coverage and Public Benefits:
  • Reginald H
    Judge: DCF Misled Court On The Law

    http://www.ctlawtribune.com

    If the state attempts to terminate parental rights, it isn't entitled to eliminate doctor-patient privilege to make its job easier.

    That's the conclusion of Judge Stuart David Bear, who, in an Aug. 25 decision, ordered the state Department Of Children and Families to stop trumpeting stale law regarding privileged treatment files.

  • HTLA Access Affirmed

    On Friday (9/15), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's judgment which entered a permanent injunction against the Hartford Board of Education in the case of Protection & Advocacy v. Hartford Bd. of Educ. This is the case where the state office of Protection and Advocacy for Persons with Disabilities (P&A) brought suit against the Hartford Board of Educ. ("HBOE") requesting access to the HBOE's controversial Hartford Transitional Learning Academy ("HTLA") to (1) observe programs and speak with students and (2) give P&A a directory of HTLA students and contact information for their parents/guardians to investigate allegations of abuse and neglect at the school. In a lengthy decision issued in February 2005, the District Court declared that defendants' refusal to provide the agency with physical access to the facility when students were present and with name and contact information for parents and legal guardians of the facility's students violated the Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Act (PAIMI), 42 U.S.C. §§ 15001-15115 and the Protection and Advocacy of Individual Rights Act (PAIR), 29 U.S.C. § 794e. Defendants were ordered to grant both physical access and names and contact information to allow the agency to perform its statutory duty to investigate suspected abuse and neglect.

    On appeal - the HBOE challenged the courts findings, and added the assertion that the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act ("FERPA") and Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA") prohibited release of information, visitation during school hours, etc. even if PAIMI and PAIR provided P&A access to the students and information. After oral argument - the Circuit Court solicited the US Depts. of Education and Health and Human Services to file amicus briefs to provide their interpretation of FERPA and IDEA. Both agencies filed documents soundly rejecting HBOE's arguments - and thus HBOE dropped that portion of their appeal, The Court went on to affirm the District Court's holding - including the issuance of the permanent injunction. The case may be found on LEXIS or Westlaw, or by going to the Second Circuit's website at http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/.

  • Who Pays for Bullying?

    In another interesting development - a New Haven Superior Court recently held that parents of a Hamden public school student who claimed their son, an alleged victim of bullying, was not adequately protected by the school, did not have a private right of action under the state's relatively new anti-bullying statute, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-222d. In Santoro v. Town of Hamden, (2006 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2418)(CV040488583), the court found, inter alia, that the school board was entitled to sovereign immunity because it was acting as an agent of the state. In addition, the court concluded that there was insufficient indicia that the legislature intended to create a private right of action under 10-222d. Finally - the plaintiffs' claim for injunctive relief also fell by the wayside as the request was "too vague and imprecise" - as there lies great discretion by school boards in implementing anti-bullying policies, and the court was loathe to fashion injunctive relief which would "not unduly interfere with governmental function."

    The case, however, leaves open the issue of whether other remedies exist for children who are victims of bullying in the public schools. While the statute appears not give rise to a private right of action for damages (according to Judge Angela Robinson) - the question remains open as to what remedies might be available pursuant to IDEA, or other civil rights statutes (as well as traditional tort remedies). A thoughtful piece by Thomas Scheffey on this case appeared in the September 11, 2006 issue of the Connecticut Law Tribune.

  • New Brochures (NCLB)
    Free Tutoring under NCLB (English)
    Tutoría Gratuita bajo NCLB (Spanish)

  • New Brochure (CCA)
    Child Abuse Project