Case: E.K. v. Stamford Bd. Of Educ.
___ F.Supp.2d ___, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43505 (D. Conn. 2007)

Education
District Court for the District of Connecticut

June 15, 2006

In March 2005, a secondary school Planning and Placement Team ("PPT") exited the plaintiff (E.K.), a student in Stamford, Connecticut, from special education upon agreeing he met the goals of his Individualized Education Plan ("IEP"). The plaintiff remained in regular education and neither his parents nor he ever raised concerns regarding his need for special education. In February and March of 2007, Stamford Public Schools suspended the plaintiff twice for fighting and the plaintiff was arrested for a felony hate crime. Stamford Public Schools provided the plaintiff with homebound instruction and subsequently scheduled an expulsion hearing. The plaintiff's parents filed a request for a due process hearing challenging the plaintiff's exit from special education and asserting a violation of procedural rights and concurrently requested relief from the hearing officer enjoining the Stamford Board of Education from proceeding with E.K's expulsion. On May 2, 2007, the hearing officer denied the application for injunctive relief. The parents then filed an action in federal district court challenging the denial of injunctive relief.

The District Court for the District of Connecticut denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. The Court held that the plaintiff was not entitled to stay-put protections because he is not currently a special education student and the defendant (the Stamford Board of Ed) did not have knowledge of his disability prior to the conduct precipitating the disciplinary action. As a result, the court denied plaintiff's claim that he is entitled to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act's stay-put provisions because he did not exhaust his administrative remedies - and because he had not obtained an administrative hearing officer's decision challenging his special education eligibility.

This case may be found at the United States District Court web site at http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/courtweb/public.htm and through electronic services such as Westlaw and Lexis.

Alexis Williams, legal intern