• Winkelman v. Parma City School Dist. (May 21, 2007)
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Education: In a surprising reversal of a 6th Circuit decision, the United States' Supreme Court held that parents may bring a pro se court action regarding any procedural or substantive claim arising under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA.) The Court rejected the view of some circuit courts that, under the statute, parents are merely "guardians" of their children's right to an appropriate education, rather than "real parties in interest".

  • M.K. ex rel. Mrs. K v. Sergi.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Education: In a procedurally complicated case the parents of a psychiatrically disabled teenager, and the prevailing party in a due process hearing, sued, among other defendants, the former Commissioner of the State Department of Education (SDOE) for violations of IDEA.

  • Mr. M. ex rel K.M. v. Ridgefield Bd. Of Educ. (Mar. 30, 2007)
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Education: This special education decision serves as a warning to school districts regarding the consequences of failing to include parents in the IEP process. In this case, the parents sought reimbursement for private school placement on the ground that the school district denied their daughter an appropriate education and denied the parents the right to participate meaningfully in the IEP process.

  • CC v. Granby Bd. Of Educ. (September 30, 2006)
    U.S. District Court
    Civil Rights, Education: In an interesting federal special education decision, the United States District Court, District of Connecticut, awarded plaintiff over $93,000 in attorney's fees for a successful administrative hearing decision garnered through a Due Process procedure.

  • Schaffer V. Weast (November 14, 2005)
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Special Education: In a decision that may have far reaching implications for disabled students eligible for special education services, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the burden of proof in an administrative "due process" hearing challenging the student's education plan is placed on the party seeking relief, whether that party is the disabled child or the local school district.